Caros redistas, Recentemente, Larry Wasserman formulou em seu blog um critério para definir um bom problema em aberto (ver abaixo). O que os caros redistas pensam sobre isso? Abs, Josemar 1. It can be stated succinctly. 2.
You can quickly explain it to a non-specialist and they will get the gist 3.
It is sexy. In other words, when you explain it to someone they Having
sexy open problems is more than just an amusement; it helps raise Can anyone suggest a good open problem that satisfies the three criteria? |